Last week Twitter has come under the scrutiny of psychologists, who have put criticism of the popular microblogging site, because it was considered anything but an instrument suited to the development of user awareness. Today it's up to the counter Facebook defendants, but for reasons far more complex.
therefore serves a premise: the world of the Internet is by definition a space and member of the manifestation of the thought of each user, the network can learn what happens in dictatorial countries, exposing serious crimes and raise awareness in towards environmental issues. This greater freedom is intrinsic to the instrument, which does not lend itself to be easily controlled. But how can you identify the line between free speech and crime?
The issue has also touched on Facebook, which in recent weeks many have ill-treated so that managers Site removed some groups who deny the Holocaust.
Facebook has agreed to ban two of the five known, but someone is not satisfied with the result, regarded as insufficient to ensure compliance of all those who have suffered - directly or indirectly - the consequences of the Holocaust and those who hold the conservation of a historical memory intact.
Facebook defends itself: there are authorities that may indicate what to do and however the team has been monitoring these groups and take action when they inneggino to violence or hatred.
However, some detractors have pointed out that Facebook phrases such as "Jews use the holocaust to Achieve Their agenda of killing innocents. Israel is the holocause (sic) of today " already embodies an attitude diverted.
Here is the real problem: freedom of expression is a right that can not justify everything , and why the laws exist, but starting from Italy, where the ' advocates crime remains a criminal case is still in force, it is unfortunately easy to configure, making it difficult the attribution of someone on the basis of expressions of extremist thought.
There remains, therefore, that combat these groups with the only weapon that Facebook and the Web offer: aggregation of thought around the issues of the Holocaust and its consequences could possibly be worth more than any censorship ; also boycott these groups, isolating them in the context of social networks, weaken them and lead them all'estinsione.
there remains a truth: not fear what you know , therefore it is good to spread positive ideas that make it clear about the Holocaust and that highlight the value of all those lives cut short in the concentration camps. The cowardice of some Facebook members have their own circle in Dante's Inferno, and in that one of the Net ..
Agnes pacha
zau3y2m9ct 
